1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 68 N.J.
  5. 68 N.J. 95 (1975)
 

SCHOOR ASSOC. v. HOLMDEL HEIGHTS CONST. CO.

68 N.J. 95 (1975)

343 A.2d 401

HOWARD M. SCHOOR, ASSOCIATES, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND SCHOOR ENGINEERING, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANTS, v. HOLMDEL HEIGHTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT, AND ALLAN (ALAN) SUGARMAN, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 14, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael K. Fielo argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Fielo and D'Alessio, attorneys; Mr. Fielo on the brief).

Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys; Mr. Geiser of counsel; Mr. Richard D. Catenacci, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by MOUNTAIN, J.

Plaintiffs, two engineering and surveying firms with identical or very similar management and ownership, brought this action to recover amounts due for professional services rendered by them to defendant, Holmdel Heights Construction Company. The latter is in receivership and the suit has proceeded, in effect, solely against defendant, Alan Sugarman. Plaintiffs' claim is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases