1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 399 F.Supp.
  5. 399 F.Supp. 1141 (1975)
 

ARMSTRONG CORK CO. v. CONGOLEUM INDUSTRIES, INC.

Civ. A. No. 73-18.

399 F.Supp. 1141 (1975)

ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY v. CONGOLEUM INDUSTRIES, INC.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 27, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward W. Mullinix, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., W. Brown Morton, Jr., Morton, Bernard, Brown, Roberts & Sutherland, Washington, D. C., George L. Herr, Theodore L. Thomas, Armstrong Cork Company, Lancaster, Pa., for plaintiff.

Lewis H. Van Dusen, Jr., Patrick T. Ryan, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., Eben M. Graves, Joseph D. Garon, Allan H. Bonnell, Bradley B. Geist, Brumbaugh, Graves, Donohue & Raymond, Michael M. Maney, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

This cause tried to the Court without a jury is submitted by plaintiff, Armstrong Cork Company (hereinafter Armstrong) for a declaratory judgment that its chemically embossed foamed vinyl floor covering process and products using lauroyl peroxide do not infringe United States Letters Patents No. 3,293,094 and No. 3,293,108 (hereinafter '094 and '108 respectively) owned by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases