1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 391 F.Supp.
  5. 391 F.Supp. 1054 (1975)
 

IN RE L. E. LAY & CO. ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No. 87.

391 F.Supp. 1054 (1975)

In re L. E. LAY & CO. ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

February 10, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard A. Specter, Litman, Litman, Harris & Specter, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff Lucille Lollar.

Victor Hlavinka, Atchley, Russell, Waldrop & Hlavinka, Texarkana, Tex., for L. E. Lay & Co.

W. Dane Clay, Rose, Nash, Williamson, Carroll & Clay, Little Rock, Ark., for First Arkansas Bankstock Corp., Worthen Bank & Trust Co., N. A.

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel.

OPINION AND ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Two antitrust class actions have been commenced in two separate districts by plaintiff Lucille Lollar charging that various defendants instituted and maintained reciprocal dealing agreements and tying arrangements and, furthermore, that they misused a common mortgage escrow trust fund. Plaintiff is both the class representative in the Texas class action and the purported class representative in the Arkansas putative class action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases