1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 531 P.2d
  5. 531 P.2d 905 (1975)
 

TISCHHAUSER v. TROTTMAN

531 P.2d 905 (1975)

E.G. TISCHHAUSER and Val Bubb, Doing Business As Tischhauser, Bubb & Co., a Co-Partnership, Appellants, v. Lucille TROTTMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 13, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Pinnock, Davis, Ainsworth & Pinnock, Ashland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

Thomas C. Howser, Cottle & Howser, Ashland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

McALLISTER, Justice.

This is an action to recover the reasonable value of accounting services allegedly performed by plaintiffs for defendant Lucille Trottman and her former husband. The case was tried on the segregated issue of whether the action was commenced within the time limited by statute.1 The court held that the plaintiffs' alleged cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, ORS 12.080, and entered judgment for defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases