1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 394 F.Supp.
  5. 394 F.Supp. 986 (1975)
 

DAY v. SIDLEY & AUSTIN

Civ. A. No. 74-1112.

394 F.Supp. 986 (1975)

J. Edward DAY, Plaintiff, v. SIDLEY & AUSTIN et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 29, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austin F. Canfield, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

James J. Bierbower, Alvin B. Davis, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PARKER, District Judge.

This case involves a dispute between a former senior partner of Sidley & Austin (S&A), a Chicago law firm, and some of his fellow partners. The controversy centers around the merger between that firm and another Chicago firm, Liebman, Williams, Bennett, Baird and Minow (Liebman firm), and the events subsequent to the merger which ultimately led to plaintiff's resignation. Plaintiff seeks damages claiming...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases