1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 398 F.Supp.
  5. 398 F.Supp. 964 (1975)
 

MANSFIELD v. WEINBERGER

Civ. A. No. 75-365.

398 F.Supp. 964 (1975)

Juanita MANSFIELD et al., Plaintiffs, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 29, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy T. Lang, Los Angeles, Cal., Arlene T. Shadoan, Washington, D. C., Philip L. Goar, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Peter C. Schaumber, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for defendant.

Before ROBB, Circuit Judge, and CORCORAN and GREEN, District Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In light of the Supreme Court decision in Weinberger v. Salfi, ___ U.S. ___, 95 S.Ct. 2457, 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975), and of the entire record herein, we conclude, sua sponte, that since no substantial constitutional question is presented a three-judge district court is not required to hear and determine this case under 28 U.S.C. § 2282 (1970). See Idlewild Liquor Corp. v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases