1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 518 F.2d
  5. 518 F.2d 718 (1975)
 

PACIFIC LIGHTING SERVICE COMPANY v. F. P. C.

Nos. 73-2538, 73-2922, 73-2630, 73-2665.

518 F.2d 718 (1975)

PACIFIC LIGHTING SERVICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. PACIFIC LIGHTING SERVICE COMPANY and Southern California Gas Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearings Denied June 9, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Ormasa, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

George W. McHenry, Jr., Sol., Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., John R. Staffier, Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Sherman Chickering, Chickering & Gregory, San Francisco, Cal., for Intervenor San Diego Gas & Electric Co.

Donald T. Quinn, Transwestern Pipeline Co., James W. McCartney, Vinson, Elkins, Searls, Connally & Smith, Houston, Tex., for Transwestern Pipeline Co.

Alfred O. Holl, Gen. Counsel, Cities Service Gas Co., Daniel R. Hopkins, Atty. Gen., Bobby E. Potts, Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., Harry S. Littman, Littman, Richter, Wright & Talisman, Washington, D. C., for Cities Service Gas Co.

John P. Mathis, J. Calvin Simpson, Lawrence Q. Garcia, San Francisco, Cal., for the People of the State of Calif. & the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California.

Gordon Pearce, San Diego, Cal., for San Diego Gas & Electric Co.

Rollin E. Woodbury, Vice President & Gen. Counsel, Rosemead, Cal., for Southern California Edison Co.

Before CHAMBERS, CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners, consumers of natural gas, seek review of the Federal Power Commission's order in Transwestern Pipeline Company (FPC No. RP 73-101) approving Transwestern's proposed tariffs which set forth nine curtailment priorities to provide for reduction of delivery to natural gas users during times of resource shortage.

The petitioners challenge the Commission's procedure. First, the petitioners assert that Commission Order No. 467, establishing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases