McADAM v. WRISLEY

No. 50-75.

349 A.2d 886 (1975)

Harold L. and Beatrice McADAM v. James and Mildred WRISLEY.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

December 2, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Burgess Associates, Ltd., Montpelier, for plaintiffs.

McKee, Clewley & FitzPatrick, Montpelier, for defendants.

Before BARNEY, C. J., and SMITH, DALEY, LARROW and BILLINGS, JJ.


LARROW, Justice.

At the close of the evidence, the Washington Superior Court directed a defendants' verdict. In form, the judgment order ran in the singular and was captioned only against the defendant James Wrisley. The mistake is obviously purely clerical and should be corrected on remand; it can be nothing else because the only claim against the defendant Mildred Wrisley was on a respondeat superior basis. Nor can...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases