1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 393 F.Supp.
  5. 393 F.Supp. 757 (1975)
 

STOKES v. HURDLE

Civ. No. 73-494-B.

393 F.Supp. 757 (1975)

James E. X. STOKES v. Dr. HURDLE et al.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

March 26, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. X. Stokes, pro se.

Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, John P. Stafford, Jr., and Emory A. Plitt, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Baltimore, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLAIR, District Judge.

Plaintiff, incarcerated at the Maryland Penitentiary, has brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1970), alleging that he was denied dental treatment while in segregation at the penitentiary. Plaintiff claims that denying routine dental treatment only to inmates in segregation, while granting such treatment to the general prison population, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases