1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 369 F.Supp.
  5. 369 F.Supp. 598 (1974)
 

AIRCRANE, INC. v. BUTTERFIELD

Civ. A. Nos. 73-1964, 73-2173.

369 F.Supp. 598 (1974)

AIRCRANE, INC. and Helicrane Construction Corporation v. Alexander P. BUTTERFIELD, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, et al. UNITED STATES of America v. SIKORSKY H-37 AIRCRAFT, Registration No. N7069, et al.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

January 3, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for Aircrane and Helicrane.

Walter S. Batty, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for United States.

Before VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge, and LUONGO and BRODERICK, District Judges.

OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

On August 10, 1973, regional officials of the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter Agency or FAA) seized a Sikorsky H-37 rebuilt military surplus helicopter owned by Aircrane, Inc. and leased by Helicrane Construction Corporation (sometimes hereinafter referred to as Aircrane, Helicrane, or Owners). That seizure gave rise to two suits. The first suit was instituted by Aircrane and Helicrane against Butterfield, et...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases