1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 380 F.Supp.
  5. 380 F.Supp. 576 (1974)
 

WURLITZER COMPANY v. ELECTROKEY, INC.

No. CA3-4803-C.

380 F.Supp. 576 (1974)

The WURLITZER COMPANY v. ELECTROKEY, INC., et al.

United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.

August 23, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Carl Richards, Richards, Harris & Medlock, Dallas, Tex., and Richard R. Trexler, and Robert M. Wolters, Olson, Trexler, Wolters, Bushnell & Fosse, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Wm. T. Wofford, Wofford, Felsman & Fails, Forth Worth, Tex., Marvin A. Henrickson, Hill, Sherman, Meroni, Gross & Simpson, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

OPINION

WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Jr., Chief Judge.

This is a patent infringement case brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 and 35 U.S.C. § 281.

Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois. Defendants Electrokey and Rhythm Band have their principal place of business in the Northern District of Texas. Defendant Moore is a resident of the Northern District of Texas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases