1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 384 F.Supp.
  5. 384 F.Supp. 533 (1974)
 

MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC. v. MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG. CO.

Civ. No. 1972-47.

384 F.Supp. 533 (1974)

MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W. D. New York.

July 2, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C. (Walter D. Ames and James H. Marsh, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), and Cohen, Swados, Wright, Hanifin & Bradford, Buffalo, N. Y. (Thomas J. Hanifin, Jr. and David T. M. Murphy, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Alexander, Sell, Steldt & DeLaHunt St. Paul, Minn. (Edward A. Haight, Chicago, Ill., Stanley G. DeLaHunt and Gary L. Griswold, St. Paul, Minn., of counsel), and Raichle, Banning, Weiss & Halpern, Buffalo, N. Y. (Ralph L. Halpern, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

Presently pending before the court is defendant's motion for summary judgment. Also pending are a number of motions by plaintiff to compel answers to interrogatories and a motion by defendant to stay discovery pending this court's decision on the motion for summary judgment. When the court first heard oral argument on these motions on August 2, 1973, the plaintiff represented that it could not answer defendant's motion for summary judgment because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases