1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 386 F.Supp.
  5. 386 F.Supp. 449 (1974)
 

UNITED STATES v. BYNUM

No. 71 Cr. 1169 (MP).

386 F.Supp. 449 (1974)

UNITED STATES of America v. Elvin Lee BYNUM et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

December 5, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., by W. Cullen MacDonald, Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiff.

Henry J. Boitel and Bernard J. Hasson, New York City, for defendant Bynum.

Patrick M. Wall, New York City, for defendants Cordovano, Wright, Small, Mitchell, Garnett, and Dyson.

H. Elliot Wales, New York City, for defendants Coniglio, Meli and Tuzzolino.

Frank Lopez, Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant Altamura; by Salvatore Canonico, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel.

Morrow D. Mushkin, Garden City, N. Y., for defendant Birnbaum.

Amedeo Lauritano and Joel Winograd, New York City, for defendant Feroldi.

Levis Nedd, pro se.

OPINION AND FINDINGS

POLLACK, District Judge.

The defendants herein were convicted by a jury of violations of the narcotics laws with the use on the trial of wiretap evidence. A motion to suppress the intercepted conversations was denied by the District Court and the issue was raised on appeal from the convictions. Before deciding the merits of the appeal, the Court of Appeals remanded the case for a hearing on whether minimization of the wiretap surveillance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases