1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 378 F.Supp.
  5. 378 F.Supp. 423 (1974)
 

LOCKLIN v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORP.

No. 52 C 1198.

378 F.Supp. 423 (1974)

Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brant, general partners doing business under the firm name of Radiant Color Company, Counter-Plaintiffs, v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORP. (formerly Switzer Brothers, Inc.), et al., Counter-Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

May 6, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Michod, Chicago, Ill., Carl Hoppe, San Francisco, Cal., for Locklin.

Samuel W. Kipnis, Chicago, Ill., Thomas V. Koykka, Arter & Hadden, Thomas J. Gray, Cleveland, Ohio, for Day-Glo Color Corp., and others.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DECKER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court at the end of a long road, extending back to 1952, on counter-plaintiffs' Application for Assessment of Attorneys' Fees.1 To put this petition in perspective, some background information on this litigation is essential.

I. History2

Day-Glo Color Corporation3 is engaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases