1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 389 F.Supp.
  5. 389 F.Supp. 387 (1974)
 

ROE v. FERGUSON

Civ. A. No. 74-315.

389 F.Supp. 387 (1974)

Rachel ROE et al., Plaintiffs, v. Joseph T. FERGUSON et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 16, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Newman, Linda K. Champlin, Clyde Ellis, Ohio Civil Liberties Union, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

William J. Brown, Atty. Gen., Thomas V. Martin, Shephen Ball, Asst. Attys. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

DUNCAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment against the defendants, Joseph Ferguson, Auditor of the State of Ohio, and Charles Bates, Director of the Ohio Department of Public Welfare. The plaintiffs in this case fall into four distinct categories. Plaintiff Roe and intervening plaintiffs Doe, Joe, Loe, Coe, Moe and Noe are all pregnant welfare recipients residing in the State of Ohio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases