1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 389 F.Supp.
  5. 389 F.Supp. 369 (1974)
 

LAMINEX, INC. v. FRITZ

No. 73 C 1554.

389 F.Supp. 369 (1974)

LAMINEX, INC., Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. Ronald C. FRITZ and Identatronics, Inc., Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

August 13, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip H. Mayer, Wolfe, Hubbard, Leydig, Voit & Osann, Chicago, Ill., Dalbert U. Shefte, Richards, Shefte & Pinckney, Charlotte, N. C., Fritz L. Schweitzer, Mandeville & Schweitzer, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Thomas E. Dorn, Kinzer & Dorn, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, Senior District Judge.

This is presently an action for patent infringement in which the defendants counterclaim for declaratory judgments of noninfringement, patent invalidity and unenforceability.

Previously the suit was more complex: plaintiff asserted claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices; defendants counterclaimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases