1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 66 N.J.
  5. 66 N.J. 7 (1974)
 

GOLDKLANG v. METROPOLITAN LIFE

66 N.J. 7 (1974)

326 A.2d 688

HARRY GOLDKLANG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 22, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom and Hack, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel H. Davis argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Dubowsky and Davis, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the majority of the Appellate Division.

Two members of the Court would reverse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Meanor in his dissent reported at 130 N.J.Super. 307 (1974).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices JACOBS, SULLIVAN and PASHMAN and Judge CONFORD — 5.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases