1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 391 F.Supp.
  5. 391 F.Supp. 337 (1974)
 

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION v. FILTROL CORPORATION

Civ. Nos. 64-1572-RJK, 66-1779-RJK.

391 F.Supp. 337 (1974)

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FILTROL CORPORATION and Texaco Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, C. D. California.

Order November 5, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armstrong & Lloyd, Orville A. Armstrong, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff; Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, George B. Finnegan, Jr., John A. Diaz, J. Robert Dailey, New York City, of counsel.

Thelan, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, James M. Radnich, John G. Flett, Los Angeles, Cal., Fish & Neave, William K. Kerr, Herbert F. Schwartz, Eric C. Woglom, William J. Hone, New York City, for defendant Filtrol.

Hulit L. Madinger, New York City, for defendant Texaco.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

KELLEHER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Mobil Oil Corporation (hereinafter "Mobil") filed an original complaint (64-1572) on November 16, 1964, charging defendants Filtrol Corporation (hereinafter "Filtrol" and Texaco Inc. (hereinafter "Texaco") with infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos. 3,140,249 and 3,140,253. Plaintiff Mobil filed a second complaint (66-1779) on November 4, 1966, charging defendants Filtrol and Texaco with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases