1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 389 F.Supp.
  5. 389 F.Supp. 274 (1974)
 

WHITFIELD v. CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORP.

No. 74-66-C (2).

389 F.Supp. 274 (1974)

Jimmie L. WHITFIELD et al., Plaintiffs, v. CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

November 22, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Lang, Law Offices of Forriss D. Elliott, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Eugene K. Buckley, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, Mo., James K. Cook, Schuchat, Cook & Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a black man, brought this Title VII action against his former employer alleging that his discharge resulted from discriminatory employment practices. The union of which plaintiff is a member was joined as a defendant on the ground that it allegedly violated its duty of fair representation by participating and acquiescing in the employer's allegedly discriminatory practices. Defendants have separately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases