1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 384 F.Supp.
  5. 384 F.Supp. 226 (1974)
 

CHICAGO & N. W. TRANSP. CO. v. SOO LINE RAILROAD CO.

No. 73 C 1018.

384 F.Supp. 226 (1974)

CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

February 5, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis T. Duerinck, Christopher A. Mills, Chicago, Ill., for Chicago and N. W. Transp. Co.

Gorham, Adams, White & DeYoung, Chicago, Ill., C. Harold Peterson, Soo Line R. Co., Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

MARSHALL, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendant's cross-motions pursuant to Rules 12(b) (6) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or in the alternative for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is founded on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases