1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 271 Md.
  5. 271 Md. 316 (1974)
 

DuPONT, GLORE, FORGAN, INC. v. BARSHACK

[No. 201, September Term, 1973.]

271 Md. 316 (1974)

316 A.2d 527

DuPONT, GLORE, FORGAN, INCORPORATED v. BARSHACK ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 20, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Glick, with whom were Allan J. Gibber and Burke, Gerber & Wilen on the brief, for appellant.

A. David Gomborov, with whom were Gomborov, Steinberg & Schlachman on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The sole question presented in this case is whether the appellees, Jack Barshack et al. (the Barshacks), seasonably pleaded limitations. We shall sustain the ruling of the trial judge (Dorf, J.) who concluded that they had.

Appellant, duPont, Glore, Forgan, Incorporated (duPont), is a stock broker. Its declaration alleged "that on or about December 24, 1968, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases