1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. T.C.
  4. 61 T.C.
  5. 61 T.C. 471 (1974)
 

LACROIX v. COMMISSIONER

Docket Nos. 5128-71-5130-71, 5133-71-5135-71, 5138-71-5145-71, 5154-71, 5218-71, 7886-71.

61 T.C. 471 (1974)

KENNETH D. LACROIX AND RHETTA S. LACROIX, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

United States Tax Court.

Filed January 17, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George L. Rogers, for the petitioners.

Earl Goldhammer and O. Richard Skopil, for the respondent.

STERRETT, Judge:

The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax as follows:

                   Petitioners                               Docket No.   Deficiency

Kenneth D. LaCroix and Rhetta S. LaCroix ------------------   5128-71      $3,002.00
Kenneth L. Lorenz and Florence H. Lorenz ------------------   5129-71       2,415.00
Orville W. Bottorff and Martha L. Bottorff ----------------   5130...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases