1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 63 Wis.2d
  5. 63 Wis.2d 449 (1974)
 

HEEZEN v. HARTLAND CICERO MUT. INS. CO.

No. 292.

63 Wis.2d 449 (1974)

217 N.W.2d 272

HEEZEN and wife, Respondents, v. HARTLAND CICERO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 7, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Bradford & Gabert of Appleton, attorneys, and Thomas A. Woodrow of Neenah, of counsel, and oral argument by Stanley R. Gabert.

For the respondents there was a brief by Miller, Gerlikowski & Suemnick and Edwin A. Gerlikowski, all of Green Bay, and oral argument by Edwin A. Gerlikowski.

HANLEY, J.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

The multiperil policy of insurance which was to be issued in the instant action incorporated therein the provisions of the statutory standard fire policy as provided for by sec. 203.01, Stats. The provision material for this appeal states:

"No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases