1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 126 N.J.
  5. 126 N.J. Super. 355 (1974)
 

STATE v. MULLEN

126 N.J. Super. 355 (1974)

314 A.2d 394

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES MULLEN ET ALS., (INDICTMENT NO. SGJ17-73-3A) DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, CARL FLORKOWSKI ET ALS., (INDICTMENT NO. SGJ17-73-3B) DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, GEORGE FOGNANO, (INDICTMENT NO. SGJ17-73-3C) DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ARTHUR HAINES, (INDICTMENT NO. SGJ17-73-6) DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 18, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. L. Steven Pessin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. Marvin D. Perskie argued the cause for defendants Schultz, Elwood, O'Brien, Mullen, Headley, Masland and Shepperson (Messrs. Perskie & Callinan, attorneys).

Mr. Patrick T. McGahn, Jr. argued the cause for defendants Finegan, Tomasini, Santoro, Horner and Demones, Lynch, McIntyre (Messrs. McGahn & Friss, attorneys).

Mr. Harry A. Goldenberg argued the cause for defendants Goff, Jones and Kolen (Messrs. Goldenberg & Mackler, attorneys).

Mr. F. Frederick Perone argued the cause for defendants Collette, Calabrese, Carl Florowski, Maxwell and Peterson.

Mr. Harold C. White argued the cause for defendants Fognano, Nicastro, Rowan, Mazur, Jacoby and Masland.

Mr. Steven W. Smoger argued the cause for defendants Anderson and Bloomberg (Messrs. Feinberg & Ginsburg, attorneys).

Messrs. Gibson, Previti and Todd argued the cause for defendant Duffield.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, FRITZ and CRANE.

PER CURIAM.

The indictments in the above matters were returned by a state grand jury (see the State Grand Jury Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:73A-1 et seq.) to Judge Schoch, the assignment judge theretofore designated by the Chief Justice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:73A-2 to act as the assignment judge thereunder. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:73A-8 Judge Schoch thereupon entered an order designating Ocean County as the county of venue for the purpose of trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases