RUSSELL v. ROBERTS

Docket No. 31441.

39 Cal.App.3d 390 (1974)

114 Cal. Rptr. 305

HENRY J. RUSSELL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HIAWATHA T. ROBERTS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

May 16, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hiawatha T. Roberts, in pro. per., for Defendants and Appellants.

Miller, Starr & Regalia and Kenneth M. Miller for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

Defendants Roberts, White, Washington, Slaughter and Richard, hereafter sometimes the "defendants," have appealed from a judgment for $5,237.31, founded on a promissory note held by plaintiff Russell. Two other defendants, Verlin Mattox and Hester Mattox, hereafter "Mattox," who were also adjudged liable on the note, have not appealed.

The superior court found the following basic facts to be true.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases