1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 65 N.J.
  5. 65 N.J. 324 (1974)
 

MAYER v. JOHN E. RUNNELLS HOSP.

65 N.J. 324 (1974)

322 A.2d 433

JOHN MAYER, NORMAN MacQUAIDE AND THOMAS J. SMITH, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHN E. RUNNELLS HOSPITAL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 26, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Mary D. Gillen argue the cause for appellants.

(Messrs. Pollis, Williams, Pappas & Dillon, attorneys for appellant MacQuaide; Messrs. Gorrin & Ironson, attorneys for appellant Mayer; and Messrs. Shevick, Ravich, Kosler & Baumgarten, attorneys for Appellant Smith.)

Mr. Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent, Messrs. Brause, Callaghan & Coyle, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 129 N.J.Super. 77.

PASHMAN, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the majority's holding and would vote to abandon the going and coming rule. The workmen's compensation statute requires that for an injury to be compensable, it must arise out of and in the course of employment. N.J.S.A. 34: 15...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases