1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 66 N.J.
  5. 66 N.J. 161 (1974)
 

KING v. SO. JERSEY NAT. BANK

66 N.J. 161 (1974)

330 A.2d 1

WILLIAM B. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SOUTH JERSEY NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 10, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Allen S. Zeller, of Camden Regional Legal Services, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant; Messrs. Saul Ferster and Carl S. Bisgaier, on the brief.

Messrs. William E. Reifsteck and Jack N. Hill argued the cause for defendant-respondent; Messrs. Farr, Reifsteck & Wolf, attorneys.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.

Challenging as invalid the repossession of an automobile (by a secured creditor, after default in payment) this appeal primarily suggests constitutional infirmity in N.J.S.A. 12A:9-503, a part of the New Jersey Uniform Commercial Code.1 It invokes, in the name of constitutional right, the conceptual reach of the policy which would provide protection in the marketplace in cases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases