1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 370 F.Supp.
  5. 370 F.Supp. 1400 (1974)
 

WEDEMANN & GODKNECHT, INC. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 4499; Protests 62/10344-91296, etc.

370 F.Supp. 1400 (1974)

WEDEMANN & GODKNECHT, INC. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

January 30, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rode & Qualey, New York City (Ellsworth F. Qualey, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Irving Jaffe, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen. (Herbert P. Larsen and Saul Davis, New York City, trial attys.), for defendant.

Before RAO, FORD and NEWMAN, Judges.

C.D. 4499; Protests 62/10344-91296, etc., against the decision of the collector of customs at the port of Philadelphia.

FORD, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule "A," annexed hereto and made a part hereof, cover offgrade filaments. The merit of the issue was decided favorably for the plaintiff in the case of Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc., a/c Burlington Industries, Inc., et al. v. United States, 59 Cust.Ct. 475, C.D. 3199, 275 F.Supp. 1017...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases