1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 398 F.Supp.
  5. 398 F.Supp. 1323 (1974)
 

STAN TOGUT CORP. v. HOBART MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 73 Civ. 1655.

398 F.Supp. 1323 (1974)

STAN TOGUT CORP. et al., Plaintiffs, v. The HOBART MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

October 22, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hammond & Schreiber, New York City by Dale A. Schreiber, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Thompson, Hine and Elory, Cleveland, Ohio by William H. Wallace, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Stan Togut Corporation, Lawrence Togut, and L. E. Togut, Inc. (the Toguts), seek summary judgment in this antitrust action on the issue of liability, pursuant to Rules 56(a) and 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, against the defendant, the Hobart Manufacturing Company (Hobart). Plaintiffs allege that the standard form "Sales Agency Franchise Agreement" of defendant Hobart contains territorial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases