1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 385 F.Supp.
  5. 385 F.Supp. 1267 (1974)
 

GROHAL v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.

No. C-74-1270-OJC.

385 F.Supp. 1267 (1974)

Patricia J. GROHAL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

November 1, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dayne L. Russell, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, David Rothman, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

ORDER

OLIVER J. CARTER, Chief Judge.

Defendant Stauffer Chemical Company has made motions to dismiss, to strike, and for a more definite statement. Plaintiff has conceded that her fifth and sixth causes of action should be stricken; she opposes the motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement as well as the motion to strike her prayer for exemplary damages.

Defendant's motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement are based upon Stauffer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases