1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 393 F.Supp.
  5. 393 F.Supp. 1079 (1974)
 

ADKINS v. NORTHFIELD FOUNDRY AND MACHINE CO.

No. 4-74-Civ. 17.

393 F.Supp. 1079 (1974)

Hamilton C. ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. NORTHFIELD FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, and Advance Machinery Company, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

November 5, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Steiner, Robins, Davis & Lyons, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Harold J. W. Sweet, Cousineau, McGuire, Shaughnessy & Anderson, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant Advance Machinery Co.

MEMORANDUM

LARSON, District Judge.

Defendant Advance Machinery Company, Inc. (Advance) seeks to dismiss the cause of action brought against it on the grounds that the attempted quasi in rem jurisdiction established over Advance by the plaintiff Hamilton C. Adkins (Adkins) is defective. Advance moves, in the alternative, to dismiss the plaintiff's cause of action on the grounds that the applicable two year Indiana statute of limitation period had expired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases