1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 381 F.Supp.
  5. 381 F.Supp. 1071 (1974)
 

PETERSEN v. FEE INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

Civ. No. 72-181.

381 F.Supp. 1071 (1974)

Eugene E. PETERSEN, an Individual; and Petersen Tool Co., a Nebraska corporation, Plaintiffs, v. FEE INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma, Civil Division.

March 29, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Hayes, Oklahoma City, Okl., John E. Reilly, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs.

Jerry J. Dunlap, Robert M. Hessin, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs claim Defendants are guilty of patent infringement, false marking and unfair competition, the latter under both Federal and State Statutes. Plaintiffs claim to own U. S. Patent No. 3,555,939 (939) which Defendants are alleged to have infringed and U. S. Patent No. 3,368,432 (432) which patent number Defendants are alleged to have used in the false marking claim. 939 covers an open-end or "crescent" type...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases