1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 384 F.Supp.
  5. 384 F.Supp. 852 (1974)
 

101 STUDIO, INC. v. BARDAL

No. 73 Civ. 3606.

384 F.Supp. 852 (1974)

101 STUDIO, INC., and Anthony Ruta, Plaintiff, v. William BARDAL, Individually and as Director of Midtown Planning, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

October 11, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kassner & Detsky, New York City, (Herbert S. Kassner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Adrian P. Burke, Corp. Counsel, City of New York, (Renee Modry, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, 101 Studios Inc., a commercial photographic studio, and its sole stockholder and president, Anthony Ruta, seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 65 enjoining the defendants, various officials of the City of New York, from enforcing the licensing provisions of Article I of Title B, Chapter 32 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York1 with respect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases