1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 381 F.Supp.
  5. 381 F.Supp. 649 (1974)
 

SCHLEGEL MANUFACTURING CO. v. KING ALUMINUM CORP.

No. 3706.

381 F.Supp. 649 (1974)

The SCHLEGEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KING ALUMINUM CORPORATION and USM Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

September 4, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Wetzel and Robert M. Ward, Wetzel, Greenawalt & Fitzgibbon, Chicago, Ill., George W. Shaw, Cumpston, Shaw & Stephens, Rochester, N.Y., Richard H. Evans, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

George N. Hibben and Albert W. Bicknell, Hibben, Noyes & Bicknell, Chicago, Ill., Lawrence B. Biebel, Biebel, French & Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, for defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

WEINMAN, District Judge.

This cause of action has been tried to the Court as a result of the motion of plaintiff to have the defendants adjudged in civil contempt for violating the terms of a decree previously rendered by this Court. A concise history of this litigation is stated in this Court's opinion printed as Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. King Aluminum Corp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases