1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 213 Kan.
  5. 213 Kan. 787 (1974)
 

METTEE v. URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY

No. 47,112

213 Kan. 787 (1974)

518 P.2d 555

LEONARD METTEE, Appellant, v. THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY and THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 26, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Fields, of Carson, Fields, Kugler & Boal, of Kansas City, Kansas, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

James J. Lysaught, of McAnany, Van Cleave & Phillips, of Kansas City, Kansas, argued the cause, and R.H. Foerschler, of the same firm, was on the brief for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

OWSLEY, J.:

This is an appeal by a landowner from a jury verdict in a condemnation case. The court-appointed appraisers awarded $18,750. The jury verdict was $17,500. The appeal to this court is based principally on the failure of the trial court to prevent improper final argument.

The subject property is six twenty-five foot lots, 125 feet deep, situated at approximately 131 Southwest Boulevard in Kansas City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases