1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 267 Md.
  5. 267 Md. 698 (1973)
 

WRIGHT v. NUTTLE

[No. 119, September Term, 1972.]

267 Md. 698 (1973)

298 A.2d 389

WRIGHT ET AL. v. NUTTLE, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GUY LEE WRIGHT

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 12, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Albright, with whom were Parker B. Smith and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes on the brief, for appellants.

William H. Price, II, with whom were Waller S. Hairston and Henry, Hairston & Price and William A. Franch on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ.

SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case, like Wolfe v. Turner, 267 Md. 646, 299 A.2d 106 (1973), involves an attack on the fees allowed counsel to a personal representative under Maryland Code (1957, 1969 Repl. Vol.) Art. 93, § 7-602. Unlike Wolfe v. Turner, however, neither the reasonableness of the hourly rate nor the amount of the charge is directly questioned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases