1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. 593 (1973)
 

SCHRAMM v. ARSENAL ESSO

63 N.J. 593 (1973)

311 A.2d 178

BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS'-RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER'S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 20, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Krauszer's Vending, Inc. (Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Pollinger on the brief).

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. (Philip M. Lustbader, David Lustbader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer's Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N.J.Super. 135 (App. Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 6.

Opposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases