1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 268 Md.
  5. 268 Md. 362 (1973)
 

MAYOR AND CITY COUNTIL OF BALTIMORE v. QUAM

[No. 103, September Term, 1972.]

268 Md. 362 (1973)

302 A.2d 17

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE ET AL. v. QUAM

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for rehearing filed April 26, 1973.

Denied May 7, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol S. Sugar, Assistant City Solicitor, with whom were George L. Russell, Jr., City Solicitor, and Ambrose T. Hartman, Deputy City Solicitor, on the brief, for appellants.

Samuel S. Eisenberg for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and LEVINE, JJ.

MURPHY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Shortly after her 1970 retirement from teaching in the Baltimore City school system, appellee, Louise G. Quam (Quam) protested to the Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baltimore (Retirement System) that there were "serious errors and even injustices" in the calculation of her service retirement allowance. Unvindicated in this claim at the administrative level, Quam...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases