1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 355 F.Supp.
  5. 355 F.Supp. 228 (1973)
 

STAMICARBON, N.V. v. CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Civ. A. No. 4442.

355 F.Supp. 228 (1973)

STAMICARBON, N.V. and Mathieu Bongard, Plaintiffs, v. CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 14, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aubrey B. Lank, of Theisen & Lank, Wilmington, Del., and Carl G. Love of Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., and Berj A. Terzian of Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

LATCHUM, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the motion of the defendant, Chemical Construction Corporation ("Chemico"), to compel the plaintiff, Stamicarbon, N.V. ("Stamicarbon"), pursuant to Rule 37(a), F.R.Civ.P., to answer interrogatories and to produce all documents identified by Stamicarbon in its answers to the interrogatories. Stamicarbon has refused the discovery on the ground that the information sought pertains to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases