1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 34 Cal.App.3d
  5. 34 Cal.App.3d 504 (1973)
 

CITY OF MODESTO v. MODESTO IRRIGATION DIST.

Docket Nos. 1700, 1701.

34 Cal.App.3d 504 (1973)

110 Cal. Rptr. 111

CITY OF MODESTO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Appellants. CITY OF MODESTO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

October 4, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charles A. Legge, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, Warren F. Gant, Gant & Gant, Ernest Geddes and Cook, Griffith & Geddes for Defendants and Appellants.

Elwyn L. Johnson, City Attorney, and Bruce W. Liedstrand, Assistant City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

GARGANO, Acting P.J.

Respondent, the City of Modesto, is a municipality operating under a home rule charter. Appellants, the Modesto and Turlock Irrigation Districts, are state agencies functioning pursuant to the provisions of the Irrigation District Law as set forth in division 11, commencing with section 20500 of the Water Code; they are presently distributing and selling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases