1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 268 Md.
  5. 268 Md. 260 (1973)
 

DIAMOND v. UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD.

[No. 150, September Term, 1972.]

268 Md. 260 (1973)

300 A.2d 215

DIAMOND ET UX. v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 14, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley H. Miller, with whom was William O. Goldstein on the brief, for appellants.

E.B. Harris, Jr., with whom were Hardwick, Tripoda & Harris, Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and G. Raymond Valle, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

DIGGES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

After the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Harris, J.) denied appellants, John and Lovetta Diamond, permission to sue the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board under what was Maryland Code (1957, 1970 Repl. Vol.), Art. 66 1/2, § 7-621, this appeal followed.1 That section in part reads:

"Any qualified person, who, after June 1, 1964, suffers damages resulting from bodily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases