After jury trial appellant was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon in violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a), and shooting on a public highway in violation of Penal Code section 374c. He appeals from the judgment entered on the jury's verdict. Appellant also requests review of the denial of his Penal Code section 995 motion to set aside the information (People v. Triggs,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. LATHUS
Docket No. 1466.
35 Cal.App.3d 466 (1973)
110 Cal. Rptr. 921
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAWRENCE EDWARD LATHUS, Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 19, 1973.
November 19, 1973.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Roderick P. Bushnell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Assistant Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, Charles P. Just and Janice Hayes, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
