1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 8 Pa.Commw.
  5. 8 Pa.Commw. 434 (1973)
 

ITTEL, JR. et al. v. TUCKER et al.

Original jurisdiction, No. 231 C.D. 1973.

8 Pa.Commw. 434 (1973)

Ittel, Jr., et al. v. Tucker, et al.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

March 13, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rochelle S. Friedman, with her Frank W. Ittel, Jr., for petitioners.

Lawrence J. Beaser, Deputy Attorney General, with him Israel Packel, Attorney General, for respondents, Tucker, Sparvero, Wekselman, Johnson and Schwartz.

William R. Caroselli, Assistant County Solicitor, with him Anthony V. DeCello, Assistant County Solicitor, and Francis A. Barry, County Solicitor, for respondents, Staisey, Foerster and Hunt.

Argued March 12, 1973, before Judges WILKINSON, JR., MENCER and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION PER CURIAM, March 13, 1973:

For the reasons set forth in our opinion filed in Allegheny County Commissioners, et al. v. C. DeLores Tucker, 7 Pa.Commw. 649, A. 2d, filed February 20, 1973, we enter the following

ORDER

AND Now, March 13, 1973, the Petition for Declaratory Judgment is allowed, and we hereby declare that the Act of December 29, 1971, P.L. 630, No. 167, Section 3, 17 P.S. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases