1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 268 Md.
  5. 268 Md. 172 (1973)
 

FORD v. BALTIMORE COUNTY

[No. 163, September Term, 1972.]

268 Md. 172 (1973)

300 A.2d 204

FORD ET AL. T/A POT SPRING JOINT VENTURE v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 9, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Lee Harrison for appellants.

Harry S. Shapiro, Chief Assistant County Solicitor, with whom were R. Bruce Alderman, County Solicitor, and Thomas J. Aversa, Jr., Assistant County Solicitor, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ.

BARNES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, in equity (Menchine, J.), two questions are presented to us: (1) is Council Bill No. 30 of the 1971 legislative session of the County Council of Baltimore County adopting new zoning regulations and new comprehensive zoning maps unreasonable, illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional as applied to the property of the appellants, Eugene F. Ford, et al., trading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases