1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 62 N.J.
  5. 62 N.J. 305 (1973)
 

CAICCO v. TOTO BROTHERS, INC.

62 N.J. 305 (1973)

301 A.2d 143

CARYL BETH CAICCO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOTO BROTHERS, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 5, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Franklin F. Feld argued the cause for petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Lewis P. Dolan, Jr. argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Messrs. Dolan & Dolan, attorneys; Mr. Robert T. Morgenstern, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D., Temporarily Assigned.

This is a workmen's compensation case in which the sole issue is whether petitioner Caicco's deceased husband was an independent contractor rather than an employee of respondent Toto Brothers, Inc. at the time of his accidental death. The Division of Workmen's Compensation found decedent to be an employee, and awarded petitioner compensation benefits. On appeal the County Court found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases