1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 366 F.Supp.
  5. 366 F.Supp. 1364 (1973)
 

HORNBLOWER & WEEKS-HEMPHILL, NOYES v. BURCHFIELD

No. 72 Civ. 4346.

366 F.Supp. 1364 (1973)

HORNBLOWER & WEEKS-HEMPHILL, NOYES, Plaintiff, v. Roy M. BURCHFIELD, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 29, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lipkin, Gusrae & Held, New York City, for plaintiff; Joel Held, New York City, Lawrence Entel, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel.

London, Buttenwieser & Chalif, New York City, for defendant.

LASKER, District Judge.

In the action underlying this motion, plaintiff, a registered broker-dealer, seeks damages from a customer for claimed violations of the securities laws resulting from defendant's alleged failure to deliver certain securities to plaintiff following plaintiff's execution of a sale transaction in his account.

Defendant asserts three counterclaims for losses suffered as a result of plaintiff's alleged violations of the applicable statutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases