1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 379 F.Supp.
  5. 379 F.Supp. 1342 (1973)
 

DAWN v. ESSEX CONVEYORS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 2809.

379 F.Supp. 1342 (1973)

Jerry DAWN et ux., Plaintiffs, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company et al., Intervening Plaintiffs, v. ESSEX CONVEYORS, INC., Defendant, Plaintiff-by-cross claim and Plaintiff-by-counterclaim. PROCESS EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Defendant-by-cross claim and Plaintiff-by-counterclaim, v. TENNESSEE EASTMAN COMPANY, Defendant-by-counterclaims.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division.

September 6, 1973 and March 19, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shelby W. Smoot, William W. Hawkins, Edgar G. Moody, Kingsport, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

H. E. Wilson, Joe W. Worley, Kingsport, Tenn., for intervening plaintiffs.

Charlton R. DeVault, Jr., M. Lacy West, Edwin L. Treadway, F. Allan Kelly, John P. Chiles, Kingsport, Tenn., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The defendant-by-counterclaims Tennessee Eastman Company moved, inter alia, for a judgment on the pleadings between it and the plaintiffs-by-counterclaim Essex Conveyors, Inc. and Process Equipment Engineering Company, Inc., respectively, relating to the respective counterclaims of the latter. Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated in this Court's memorandum opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases