1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. 99 (1973)
 

HORNYAK v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.

63 N.J. 99 (1973)

305 A.2d 65

MICHAEL HORNYAK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 21, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mrs. Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pellettieri & Rabstein, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Mannion, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Appellate Division, in an unreported opinion, affirmed the denial of a workmen's compensation award to the plaintiff; we certified on his application. 62 N.J. 188 (1972).

The plaintiff was employed as a shipper in the respondent's distribution warehouse at Cedar Lane, Florence, New Jersey. His working hours were from 9:30 P.M....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases