1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 394 F.Supp.
  5. 394 F.Supp. 994 (1973)
 

WINKELMAN v. BLYTH & CO., INC.

Nos. 72-474 and 73-185.

394 F.Supp. 994 (1973)

Walter E. WINKELMAN and Paul F. Becker, Plaintiffs, v. BLYTH & CO., INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Elmer G. ANDERSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. BLYTH EASTMAN DILLON & CO. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

August 31, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Murray, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs.

Leigh D. Stephenson, Dezendorf, Spears, Lubersky & Campbell, Portland, Or., for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SKOPIL, District Judge.

Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The defendants allege that the plaintiffs' actions are barred. ORS 59.115(5) and 12.110(1).

Defendant Blyth, Eastman, Dillon & Co. is a broker-dealer. Thomas Moore, a security salesman and vice president of the corporation, and John Van Laningham, a security salesman of the corporation, are also named as defendants.

In Anderson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases