TONGUE, Justice.
This is an action for damages for breach of a logging contract. After a jury trial a verdict and judgment were entered awarding plaintiff the sum of $11,255.05. Defendants appeal. We affirm.
Defendants' principal contention is that plaintiff's evidence of damages was "speculative in nature" and without sufficient "supporting data" to satisfy the requirements adopted by this court in Douglas Const. v. Mazama Timber, 256 Or. 107,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.